I'm not really convinced by Dennis Perkins' argument given on the "Let go of your guilt" section. I feel that that it is important to put it behind, but at the same time keep it close. This is because I believe letting it go is absolutely opposite of learning from it. Putting a lid on your fears and traumas, while hiding them in a corner will not take you anywhere. It is more important to face them head-on, struggle, and learn to overcome. This is not easily said than done, but I think these are the places our friends and teammates can help us. A lone-isolated leader does not gather affection and teamwork. A talkative and sympathetic one does.
I was also really confused by the example of Joe and Simon climbing a mountain. If Yates did indeed let go of his guilt and decided to break camp as scheduled, I am sure that Simpson would not have made it back in time. It was indeed the feeling of guilt that Yates could not overcome, which lead to Simpson's survival. I had liked this book so far, but I'm starting to get a little skeptical on some aspects of the book.
Sunday, 29 September 2013
Tuesday, 24 September 2013
Chapter 2 The encounter of two conflicting leaderships -psychology and research writing-
Presence, symbolism, personal example. These are the values embolded into this chapter of "Leading at the Edge".
This chapter indicates that although there are times when leaders must have a mutal relationship with their subordinates, it is necessary for them to stand above firmly and stay unaffected by emotions.
However, I attended a psychological seminar today which took the opposite stand towards leadership.
The professor handeling the talk session -Kazunori Hahsimoto- does counceling sessions for both people of Fukushima and corporate leaders. During his seminar, Hashimoto pointed out that both the evacuees of Fukushima and corporate leaders shared a common trait. They were stubborn and unwilling to express their doubts and worries towards others. Hashimoto exclaimed that leaders, in particular, should be a person who can show his/her weaknesses to the people they lead, so that the subordinates can be frank about their own problems. Being able to talk to one's boss, said Hashimoto, is necessary to keep an organization working.
I cannot say at this moment which leader figure is the ideal; the benevolent, firm leader from RW, or the vulnerable and wavering leader from Hashimoto's opinion. I hope this conflict of two leader visions get resolved in the future chapters.
Saturday, 21 September 2013
A little bit about Shackleton (and whiskey!)
Sucks that I'm not a leader at anything right now. Actually, I've never been one. Can't wait to be in a position where I can bring the power I learn in this course to use.
So, I like watching documentary films. One of these that I watched on history channel was surprisingly about Shackleton! It's about his expedition on the "Nimrod" in 1907, but is still quite a nice story.
So, I like watching documentary films. One of these that I watched on history channel was surprisingly about Shackleton! It's about his expedition on the "Nimrod" in 1907, but is still quite a nice story.
It's about recreating this bottle of whiskey Shackleton's expedition left behind when he needed to discard the unnecessary load |
I dream of the day when I can drink this wonderful batch of "Mackinlay's rare highland malt" dubbed "The Enduring Spirit".
People say a picture is worth a thousand words. I wonder how many words a youtube video is worth...
Wednesday, 18 September 2013
Recent encounter with art
Leadership ≒ Creativity
They are very similar. Leadership is mainly about how to get people to do what they want. They require powerful impressions, and must stand out from all others. Creativity also is about being different from the surrounding. Both leadership and creativity captures attention, and conveys a powerful message through the masses.
I will stress out that creativity mentioned here is positive creativity.
In this blogpost, I would like to talk about a recent incident that gave me a strong impression on creativity.
So I was with my friend at Kichijoji. We went to a pleasant restaurant and on our way home decided to go and have a look at the contemporary wall painting in an alley near a parking lot.
We were blown away.
The painting was packed with so much color and detail, that it took us a very long time to understand what exactly was written on it. Actually, I am still not sure what is drawn on the wall. But nevertheless, we were intrigued by the powerful strokes of the graffiti painting.
We became engaged in a conversation on what the "message" was in this particular art. I told her that there used to be another painting on this wall which was covered up by the old one. She, having lived in the US, told me about the wall paintings that she saw back in Penn. They were called Mural art, and was sometimes drawn to cover up explicit graffiti. She told me that although crude words, they were messages of the people living on those streets, and it is not a very good idea to cover up their cries to the world.
I recalled two paintings that came up in Dan Brown's new book "Inferno".
The two paintings in the "Hall of Five Hundred"
The Hall of five hundred is the famous hall located in the heart of the town hall of Florence, Italy |
When I mentioned the futile attempts of recording a shadow of a lost piece of art, my friend mentioned one Mural art which painted a shadow of a church that used to exist there. I could not find a photo of the wall art, but had recently seen it somewhere in a design magazine. When the church was taken down, the people decided to paint that wall with its shadow in memory of the building.
This made me remember the unnerving shadows in Hiroshima.
These are not artworks. They are the shadows of the people who were there on that fateful day when the atomic bomb fell. Their bodies were instantly disintegrated, but their shadows were permanently imprinted on the concrete. Their physical self has been gone for decades, but even today, we can feel their souls trapped on this staircase.
Okay, the last image may have nothing to do with creativity.
But recently, I have started to see messages in artworks. Not just artworks, in daily objects as well. I think that human life as a quest. A quest to search for what message you are trying to convey to the rest of the world. Some people know it from the start and can leave their marks on the wall, such as that graffiti art in kichijoji. Others realize through a collaboration with many people, after large personal events. Some, like owner of the shadows in Hiroshima, do not even know that they have left a message behind. Sometimes, they are covered up by others. Sometimes, they remain for eternity. Creating a strong message that remains in the heart of people forever. This is my creativity.
Thursday, 12 September 2013
Social intelligence and the Biology of leadership, mixed with tomato sauce
So, we talked about the HBR article, social intelligence and the biology of leadership.
It was a tiny iceberg
But it rocked my world
*
So ever since little I had this dilemma
I liked talking to people
But they didn't like talking to me
I would work hard to be social in order to make friends, but there were always people in the class who would just be sitting there and making friends
I envied those people who would have the natural talent of attracting people.
BUT NEVER REALLY THOUGHT WHY THEY COULD DO IT
Charisma is not innate, it is acquired
well I guess it could be something you are born with as well
Steve jobs |
Robert Friedland |
had acquired it from
This article has introduced me to this theory. Now I would like to know
HOW to gain Social Intelligence
*
So I was looking up about this guy named Malcolm Gladwell
in hopes of finding out more about social intelligence
and came up to this video
This guy
Keeps on talking about
This guy
and
This Tomato Sauce
WTH?
Where did Social Intelligence go?
But I decided to listen to him talk about Howard Moskowitz and his revolution on tomato sauce
(Gladwell was a good presenter anyways)
and it was super interesting!
Howard Moskowitz did three things
1 consumers don't know what they want
2 democratized what we think about taste
3 movement from search of universals to individuality
#1 asking consumers what kind of tomato sauce they like will not come up with a valid result. People have subliminal tastes that they cannot declare
#2 there is no hierarchy in tomato sauce. there is no better tomato sauce
#3 there is no universal tomato sauce that will satisfy everyone. It is important to put people in multiple clusters and provide them with what each cluster wants.
Pretty cool, huh?
I better get to work on the new article Ken gave us....
End
Monday, 9 September 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)